Safety of Additional Local Anesthetics Soon After Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors

Daniella Veloria, Lei Xu, Elizabeth Rader, David Ha, Daniel Gessner

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 7. Pages e112872. Epub Jul 17, 2026.

Abstract

Introduction Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) produces a prolonged serum bupivacaine level. It carries a warning to avoid additional local anesthetics for 96 hours due to a theoretical additive risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). Whether patients exposed to additional local anesthetics soon after LB have a clinically detectable increased risk of LAST is unknown. Materials and methods Data from a single academic center were used in a cohort study of adults who received LB intraoperatively. The exposure was to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB administration, and the outcome was a composite of electronic medical record data indicating possible LAST. The cumulative incidence and hazard of possible LAST (with weighted adjustment for propensity to exposure to additional local anesthetics) were calculated. A propensity score-matched sensitivity analysis was performed using an outcome based on a manual chart review. Results We identified 4306 patients who received LB, of whom 466 (12.1%) were exposed to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of possible LAST between exposed and unexposed patients (0.9% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.28) as compared to unexposed and no significant increase in the unadjusted hazard (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.42, p = 0.21) or the adjusted hazard (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.89, p = 0.033) of possible LAST after exposure to additional local anesthetic. The sensitivity analysis had similar findings. Conclusions We found no evidence that exposure to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB administration increases the hazard of possible LAST.

PMID:
42605485
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.