Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cold Ischemia Time Is an Important Risk Factor for Prolonged Length of Stay Post-Lung Transplantation.

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Elli Youngeun Lee, Michelle Miao, Adam Ard, John Miggins, Ashley Montgomery, Ramiro Fernandez, Abbas Rana

Published in

Clinical transplantation. Volume 40. Issue 8. Pages e70651.

Abstract

In lung transplantation (LTx), optimal cold ischemia time (CIT) is considered <6 h, but is often extended to maximize allograft utilization. Given the limited analysis of how variation in CIT impacts outcomes, we examined its correlation with graft survival, patient mortality, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS), defined as ≥30 days.
Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we retrospectively analyzed 39 806 adult LTx between May 4, 2005, and December 1, 2025. Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) cases (n = 1378) were isolated for separate analysis. The remaining 39 161 were categorized into hourly CIT increments. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses with three outcomes of interest: PLOS, graft survival, and patient mortality.
CIT correlated more strongly with PLOS than graft survival or patient mortality. CIT <5 h was protective against PLOS, while >6 h increased risk. A steady and significant increase in odds of PLOS with increasing CIT was observed, with risks lowest at 3-4 h (odds ratio [OR], 0.829; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.755-0.911) and highest at 11-12 h (OR, 2.02; 95%CI, 1.61-2.54). Isolated EVLP analysis showed no such significant correlation.
Nearly every hour increases in CIT showed a significant impact on odds of PLOS after LTx. Minimizing CIT is critical to reduce posttransplant PLOS and associated healthcare costs. Novel methods of preservation may be key to mitigate this risk.

PMID:
42608347
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement