Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rapidly Progressive Retroperitoneal Dissemination of Plasmacytoid Urothelial Carcinoma Presenting With Multiorgan Obstruction After Radical Cystectomy: A Case Report.

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Mahito Atsuta, Naoki Uchida, Hirokazu Kagawa, Naoya Tomomasa, Shun Saito, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Kosuke Iwatani, Shun Sato, Takahiro Kimura, Jun Miki

Published in

IJU case reports. Volume 9. Issue 5. Pages e70249. Epub Aug 16, 2026.

Abstract

Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC) is a rare, aggressive subtype of bladder cancer characterized by diffuse infiltrative growth and a propensity for peritoneal and retroperitoneal dissemination.
A patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT3N1M0) was diagnosed with conventional high-grade urothelial carcinoma without subtype histology on transurethral resection. After neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy, robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction was performed. Final pathological examination revealed PUC (pT4aN2). Within weeks after surgery, the patient developed sequential retroperitoneal fluid accumulation, bilateral hydronephrosis, duodenal obstruction, and biliary obstruction, suggesting rapid diffuse retroperitoneal progression. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was initiated; however, the disease progressed aggressively, and the patient died on postoperative day 80.
PUC may evade detection on initial TUR and can progress rapidly through diffuse retroperitoneal dissemination even after radical cystectomy. Early postoperative, unexplained multiorgan obstructive findings should raise suspicion of occult progression and prompt timely initiation of systemic therapy.

PMID:
42609402
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement