Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Endolymphatic Sac Tumors With Aberrant Immunophenotypes.

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Nicholas Polster, Hector Mesa, Tieying Hou, Ellen J Giampoli, Dongwei Zhang

Published in

International journal of surgical pathology. Pages 10668969261464470. Aug 18, 2026. Epub Aug 18, 2026.

Abstract

Endolymphatic sac tumor (ELST) is a rare, locally destructive, but non-metastasizing neoplasm arising from the intraosseous epithelium of the endolymphatic duct and sac. Morphologically and immunohistochemically, ELST overlaps with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and both neoplasms occur with increased frequency in patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. The largest study to date comparing the immunophenotypes of ELST and RCC found that 100% of ELSTs (25/25) were positive for CA9, whereas all tested ELSTs were negative for CD10 (0/16) and RCC (0/15). They concluded that strong expressions of PAX8 and CA9 and negative expressions of CD10 and RCC are helpful in discriminating between metastatic RCC and ELST. We present two ELSTs that defy this postulate and expand the immunophenotypic profile of these tumors. The first ELST occurred in a 66-year-old woman and was positive for PAX8, CA9, and RCC, and negative for CD10. The second ELST occurred in a 61-year-old man and was positive for PAX8 but negative for CA9. No VHL mutation was identified by whole exome sequencing in the latter tumor. Both patients had no history of RCC and no detectable renal mass on imaging at diagnosis and on follow-up. Our findings indicate that recommended immunohistochemical panels for distinguishing ELST from metastatic RCC are not reliable, underscoring the importance of integrating clinical history and radiologic findings to differentiate tumors with overlapping genetics, histology, and immunophenotype for appropriate patient management.

PMID:
42610954
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement