Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Fabrication of a Flexible Dual-Ion-Modified SERS Sensor and Its Application in Rapid, Trace Detection of Kidney Injury Biomarkers.

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Jinglei Yang, Yiqing Chen, Hongning Gu, Peiru Jiang, Ruiyun You, Yaling Wu, Li Zhang, Li Chen, Fuyuan Hong, Yudong Lu

Published in

Analytical chemistry. Volume 98. Issue 32. Pages 23495-23506. Aug 18, 2026.

Abstract

To mitigate the interference from the complex composition of urine from patients with kidney injury and the challenging urinary environment, this study addresses the need for early screening of medium-sized molecular biomarkers in urine. To enable dynamic monitoring of multiple dialysis biomarkers, we propose developing a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensing system using bacterial cellulose modified with two types of ionic groups. By sequentially treating the bacterial cellulose membrane (BCM) with quaternary ammonium cations and tannic acid anions through layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly, we created a flexible SERS sensor featuring an asymmetric charge distribution and a porous hierarchical structure. This design effectively harnesses localized surface plasmon resonance effects, boosting signal detection and enhancing the selective recognition of medium-sized molecular biomarkers in complex urine samples. The enhancement factor for the QBCM@Ag NPs sensor is 1.51 × 102, while the TABCM@Ag NPs sensor achieves 9.15 × 102. The detection limits for kynurenic acid and spermidine in urine are as low as 1.056 μM and 1.456 μM, respectively. This research represents a significant advancement in the targeted adsorption and SERS-based detection of medium- and small-sized molecules within complex biological urine samples.

PMID:
42610901
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement