Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Vascular dynamics in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ophthalmic Doppler indices in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Muchtar Hanafi, Tonang Dwi Ardyanto, Widiastuti Soewondo, Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari, Muthmainah, Wachid Putranto, Senyum Indrakila

Published in

Diabetes & vascular disease research. Volume 23. Issue 4. Pages 14791641261476327. Epub Aug 18, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundOphthalmic Doppler ultrasonography is a non-invasive technique for evaluating hemodynamic changes in diabetic patients. This meta-analysis assessed ophthalmic Doppler indices in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy compared to non-diabetic controls.MethodsWe searched Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink for studies investigating Doppler ultrasound parameters in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Pooled mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using random-effects models for peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), resistive index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C.ResultsFourteen studies (1,217 patients) were included. People with diabetes without retinopathy showed significantly elevated RI (MD 0.08, P=0.004) and PI (MD 0.30, P<0.0001) in the ophthalmic artery versus controls. The central retinal artery showed marked reductions in PSV and EDV (P<0.00001) and increased RI (P=0.001) in established DR. RI was also elevated in the posterior ciliary artery across all diabetic stages. Diagnostic accuracy analyses yielded pooled RI sensitivity of 0.73-1.00 and PI sensitivity of 0.79-1.00.ConclusionOphthalmic artery Doppler indices, particularly RI and PI, were associated with DR severity that may represent possible additional markers of microvascular dysfunction. However, these findings require confirmation in well-designed prospective studies before RI and PI can be considered established early markers.

PMID:
42610439
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement