Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

RAF/MEK Clamp Inhibition with Avutometinib and Cetuximab in RAF1 S257L-Mutated, Anti-EGFR-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Gaucher's disease.

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Ashley Rose, Alix Rosenberg, Udhayvir Singh Grewal, Timothy J Brown, Nicholas Hornstein

Published in

The oncologist. Aug 19, 2026. Epub Aug 19, 2026.

Abstract

RAF1 alterations are rare in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), occurring in roughly 0.5% of cases, and lack established treatment guidance. We present a patient with RAF1 S257L-mutated, RAS wild-type mCRC and concurrent type 1 Gaucher disease, whose baseline cytopenias precluded standard chemotherapy and clinical-trial enrollment. After progression on fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens (the latter with the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab) complicated by recurrent neutropenic sepsis, he received off-label avutometinib and defactinib (an oral RAF/MEK clamp inhibitor plus a FAK inhibitor) combined with cetuximab. He achieved a radiographic response, biomarker decline, hematologic recovery, and improvement in ECOG performance status from 3 to 0, with benefit lasting approximately 6 months. At progression, circulating tumor DNA revealed persistence of RAF1 S257L at high allele fraction with RAF1 amplification, together with newly acquired EGFR ectodomain mutations, KRAS alterations, and a MAP2K1 alteration-a polyclonal pattern of convergent MAPK/EGFR reactivation. This case illustrates how a molecular tumor board can translate a rare driver into a rational, individualized regimen, and how serial liquid biopsy informs resistance and next steps.

PMID:
42616657
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement