Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Utilization of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening among Specialists in Visceral Medicine: Results from a Questionnaire-Based Survey at the "Viszeralmedizin 2021'' Congress in Leipzig.

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Selina Böttcher, Can Gero Leineweber, Miriam Rabehl, Isabel Elena Haller, Jonas Wördemann, Karsten Henrich Weylandt, Siegbert Faiss, Christoph Schmöcker

Published in

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. Aug 19, 2026. Epub Aug 19, 2026.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Physicians serve as role models for preventive care, yet data on CRC screening uptake among German visceral medicine specialists are scarce.
An anonymous, questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among participants of the Visceral Medicine 2021 Congress in Leipzig. Physicians reported sociodemographics, personal colonoscopy participation and lifestyle factors. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed.
Of 369 physicians included, 54.4% had undergone a colonoscopy. Among those aged ≥ 50 years (n = 177), 81.9% had participated, three-quarters within the CRC screening program. Notably, 28.9% of physicians < 50 years had already undergone colonoscopy, mainly for screening purposes. Outpatient physicians were significantly more likely to have undergone colonoscopy, independent of age and sex. Medical specialty was not significantly associated with participation.
Visceral medicine physicians show higher CRC screening participation than the general population. Lower participation among hospital-based physicians suggests structural disparities warranting further investigation.

PMID:
42618007
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement