Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of the VISITECT CD4 Lateral Flow Point-Of-Care Assay for Identifying Advanced HIV Disease.

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Mariana Andreani, Claudia E Frola, Liliana Guelfand, Fabiana C Chaile, José Barletta, María J Rolón, Mariana Erbin, Juan L Rodriguez-Tudela

Published in

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. Pages e70340. Aug 19, 2026. Epub Aug 19, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the performance and reader-dependent variability of the VISITECT CD4 lateral flow assay (LFA) as a screening tool for identifying advanced HIV disease (AHD; CD4 ≤ 200 cells/μL) during routine programmatic implementation.
We conducted a two-phase diagnostic evaluation in Argentina, including a training phase (n = 100) and a validation phase (n = 249), for a total of 349 participants, comparing VISITECT CD4-LFA with flow cytometry. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the manufacturer-recommended cut-off. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to estimate the implicit CD4 thresholds applied by readers.
The VISITECT CD4-LFA showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 94-100) in both phases. Specificity improved from 19% (95% CI 8-35) to 40% (95% CI 31-49) after training, with accuracy increasing from 42% (95% CI 33-53) to 57% (95% CI 51-63). ROC analysis demonstrated a shift in the implicit reader threshold from 363 to 270 cells/μL, indicating improved interpretation with experience.
The VISITECT CD4-LFA is a highly sensitive point-of-care (POC) tool for AHD screening, though its visual design limits specificity, highlighting the need for reader-independent technologies.

PMID:
42619277
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 0
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement