Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The pleiotropic landscape of rare variant associations with multiple cancers in large biobanks.

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Austin Hammermeister Suger, Tabitha A Harrison, Jiachen Zhang, Michael C Wu, Burcu F Darst, Sara Lindström

Published in

HGG advances. Pages 100662. Aug 20, 2026. Epub Aug 20, 2026.

Abstract

Previous association studies between germline rare genetic variation and cancer risk have primarily examined a limited number of cancers in clinical samples, often with participants predominantly of European genetic ancestry. We conducted exome-wide rare variant association analyses across 70+ cancer types using data from more than 729,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB) and All of Us Research Program (AoU) cohorts. We used generalized linear mixed models to screen for cancer pleiotropic effects by conducting gene-based and single variant tests of predicted loss of function (pLoF) and missense variants and six groups of cancer defined by biological and etiological similarities. We then assessed significant genes for associations with 27 individual cancer types that had data for at least 500 cases. Of the 33 potential pleiotropic genes identified, 16 consistently showed significant associations across ≥ 3 individual cancer types. For example, the presence of at least one CHEK2 pLoF variant was associated with increased odds of diagnosis with 14 different cancers (OR range: 1.34 - 3.21). Similarly, the presence of at least one RTEL1 missense variant was associated with lower odds of diagnosis with 9 cancers (OR range: 0.67 - 0.88). Our results expand our knowledge about these loci and point to a larger impact on overall cancer risk than previously appreciated.

PMID:
42619260
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement