Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

What are the Barriers and Enablers of Survivorship Care Plan Use by Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivors?

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Brittany Mutsaers, Tori Langmuir, Carrie MacDonald-Liska, Justin Presseau, Gail Larocque, Cheryl Harris, Marie-Hélène Chomienne, Lauriane Giguère, Paola Michelle Garcia Mairena, Dina Babiker, Kednapa Thavorn, Sophie Lebel

Published in

Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique. Volume 36. Issue 2. Pages 176-184. Epub Mar 01, 2026.

Abstract

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been recommended after treatment as transition tools for low-risk cancer survivors, but research on their efficacy has been inconclusive. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for cancer survivors use of SCPs.
Interview guides were developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Breast and colorectal cancer survivors (n = 30) who had been discharged from the cancer centre to primary care were interviewed. Data analysis involved deductive content and inductive thematic approaches.
Enablers of SCP use included survivors 1) finding that SCPs are a reassuring resource that contains relevant information to guide follow-up care; 2) discussing SCPs with their primary care providers; 3) recognizing their follow-up care as one's own responsibility; and 4) having the purpose of SCPs explained to them. Barriers included 1) misplacing their SCP; 2) difficulty accepting discharge to primary care; and 3) wanting continued follow-up from oncology specialists.
Survivors need education on their role in actively managing their care, what to expect in follow-up care, and the purpose and use of SCPs.

PMID:
42621999
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement