Lung cancer mortality of workers occupationally exposed to titanium dioxide in Germany: new insights from a retrospective cohort study after accounting for smoking status.

Authors

Hansa Jannis, Merzenich Hiltrud, Langner Ingo, Blettner Maria, Klug Stefanie J, Gianicolo Emilio

Published in

International journal of hygiene and environmental health. Volume 277. Pages 114890. Aug 20, 2026. Epub Aug 20, 2026.

Abstract

Evidence regarding carcinogenic effects of inhaled titanium dioxide (TiO₂) dust is inconclusive. Several cohort studies investigated worker populations in TiO₂ factories, the largest of which included 15,017 individuals in multiple European countries. We have re-analyzed the data of the German sub-cohort from this European study to investigate the association between TiO₂ exposure and lung cancer mortality. The observation period covered 50 years (1950-1999). Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated and indirectly adjusted for smoking. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), stratified by smoking status, adjusted for co-exposures, and lagged by 0/10/20 years. Cumulative exposure was estimated through a job-exposure matrix. 4862 male workers from three TiO₂ factories were included (131,475 person-years). Smoking status was available for 55% of workers. At the end of follow-up, 1015 deaths were recorded, 115 of which due to lung cancer. The adjusted SMR for lung cancer mortality was 1.67 (n = 4650; 95%CI: 1.41-1.98), with no trend across exposure levels. Adjusted Cox models showed no increased hazard for ever-smokers and workers with unknown smoking status, and a weak association for never-smokers (n = 2880; HR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.96-1.21), with exposure lagged by 20 years. This is one of the few occupational cohort studies on TiO₂ inhalation where smoking was accounted for in analyses. Exposure-response associations of similar magnitude for TiO₂ dust and lung cancer mortality have been reported by other studies. However, findings need to be interpreted with caution due to several methodological limitations, highlighting the need for further research with new data.

PMID:
42624005
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.