Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Collagen turnover biomarkers as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapy monitoring indicators in gastric cancer.

Created on 21 Aug 2026

Authors

Leonard Kaps, Muhammed A Genc, Markus Möhler, Stephan Grabbe, Shifana C Sadiq, Jörn M Schattenberg, Detlef Schuppan, Rasmus Sund Pedersen, Morten A Karsdal, Philipp Mildenberger, Annett Maderer, Nicholas Willumsen

Published in

Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers. Volume 43. Pages 18758592261468629. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundCirculating collagen turnover markers, including reC1M, PRO-C3, C3M, C4G, PRO-C8, TUM, PRO-C11, and PRO-C17, may serve as non-invasive biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC).MethodsEight serum collagen turnover markers were quantified in 74 pretreated GC patients from the SUNCASE trial and compared to 50 healthy donors. Markers were assessed at baseline and longitudinally after the first and second chemotherapy cycle. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by AUROC analysis; prognostic value was assessed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.ResultsAll markers except C4G were significantly elevated in GC patients vs. controls (p < 0.001). C3M showed the strongest diagnostic performance (AUROC 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95; sensitivity 78%, specificity 77%). Elevated reC1M (HR 2.70), C3M (HR 2.33), PRO-C11 (HR 2.14), and TUM (HR 2.09) were independently prognostic of shorter OS. None of the established tumor markers (CA 19-9, CEA, CA 72-4) retained prognostic significance. Longitudinally, a >20% reduction in PRO-C3 and PRO-C11 after the first chemotherapy cycle was associated with longer OS.ConclusionCollagen turnover markers reC1M, C3M, TUM, and PRO-C11 are independent prognostic markers for OS in advanced GC. C3M demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing GC patients from healthy controls.

PMID:
42627091
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement