Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prosthetic restoration material selection using an integrated Fermatean fuzzy MCDM method.

Created on 21 Aug 2026

Authors

Ece Akkaya, Melike Cari, Tolga Kudret Karaca, Bahar Yalcin Kavus, Ertugrul Ayyildiz

Published in

Science progress. Volume 109. Issue 3. Pages 368504261478359. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate dental crown material requires the simultaneous consideration of clinical performance, aesthetics, cost, and patient-related expectations. This study aimed to support dentists in selecting the most suitable dental prosthetic restoration material under uncertainty. An integrated Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework was employed by combining the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method for weighting and the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method for ranking alternatives. Six restorative material alternatives were evaluated using eleven sub-criteria grouped under three main dimensions: mechanical, visual, and eco-nomic. The criteria were identified through literature review and expert opinion. The findings indicated that clinical longevity was the most important criterion in the evaluation process. Among the six alternatives, the resin nano-ceramic CAD/CAM material achieved the highest overall performance, followed by the lithium disilicate CAD/CAM and zirconia-based ceramic materials. Across the tested λ values and ±20% changes in the three highest-weighted criteria, the ranking order remained unchanged, indicating that the results were stable within the examined sensitivity scenarios, confirming the robustness of the proposed framework. The proposed framework provides a transparent decision-support tool for restorative dentistry and demonstrates the applicability of Fermatean fuzzy MCDM methods to dental material selection.

PMID:
42627192
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement