Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Yicong Huang, Ali Shamsnia, Mengze Chen, Shuang Wu, Timothy Stamm, Sophie Medico, Farzaneh Najafi

Published in

Science advances. Volume 12. Issue 34. Pages eaed6417. Aug 21, 2026. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

Ramping neural activity is widely interpreted as a signature of predictive processing, but whether these signals truly reflect predictions or instead emerge from sensory mechanisms remains unclear. To address this question, we used two-photon calcium imaging across multiple cell types in visual and parietal cortex, while awake mice passively received repeated audiovisual stimuli presented under distinct temporal structures. Neurons segregated into two broad response classes: stimulus-activated (ramp-down) and stimulus-inhibited (ramp-up) populations with diverse temporal kinetics. Multiple findings argued against a predictive interpretation: Ramping activity was present in naïve animals, neural responses changed immediately after short/long interval transitions, and unexpected stimulus timings elicited nearly identical responses in predictable and irregular contexts. Population analyses further showed that ramping reflected relaxation from stimulus-evoked activity rather than anticipatory buildup. Heterogeneous kinetics generated a robust population code for elapsed time. Together, these findings show that neural ramps during passive stimulation arise from stimulus-evoked dynamics that intrinsically generate temporal signals, rather than from temporal predictive processing.

PMID:
42627925
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement