Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rethinking clinical response criteria in trials of chronic enteropathy in dogs: what change is truly meaningful?

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Tristan Méric, Claire Vérollet, Elodie Darnis, Moez Rhimi, Juan Hernandez

Published in

Journal of veterinary internal medicine. Volume 40. Issue 4. Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

Rethinking response criteria of treatment of chronic enteropathy in dog is necessary, as clinical activity indices are widely used as primary endpoints despite substantial variability in how "response," "remission," and "relapse" are defined. Across recent studies, response thresholds range from modest relative reductions (eg, ≥25%) to stringent targets (eg, ≥75%), absolute score cut-offs, shifts between severity categories, or binary resolution of clinical signs. This methodological heterogeneity undermines comparability between trials and complicates evidence synthesis. An often-overlooked contributor to this issue is the intrinsic variability of the Canine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index and the Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index, particularly their limited inter-observer reproducibility for total scores and several core items. When commonly used response thresholds overlap with expected measurement error, apparent clinical improvement might reflect scoring variability rather than true change in disease activity. We therefore propose a pragmatic framework for response classification anchored in the measurement properties of these instruments. For research endpoints, an absolute change of at least 4 points (Δ ≥ 4) is suggested as a conservative minimal detectable change to reduce misclassification of responders and non-responders. In dogs with low baseline scores driven by 1 or 2 isolated abnormalities, an item-centered approach (Δ item ≥2) might be more appropriate, particularly for variables such as stool consistency or defecation frequency. Finally, transparent reporting of scoring conditions, prioritization of evaluator consistency, and integration of complementary outcomes, including validated health-related quality-of-life measures and longitudinal symptom tracking, might help better capture clinically meaningful effects.

PMID:
42627936
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement