Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Antiretroviral regimen switch and short-term viral suppression in persistent low-level viremia: A multicenter retrospective real-world cohort study in China.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Hao Liu, Yiming Ren, Lin Jia, Lijing Wang, Rugang Wang, Tongtong Yang, Yingquan Zhou, Hongxin Zhao, Lili Dai

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 8. Pages e0355744. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

Persistent low-level viremia (pLLV) remains clinically challenging among people living with HIV (PWH) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and whether ART regimen switching improves virologic outcomes remains controversial.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective real-world cohort study across seven Chinese medical institutions. Adults with pLLV (50 copies/mL ≤ plasma viral load [VL] < 1000 copies/mL) were included and classified into a non-switch (control) group or a switch group based on the management decision of treating physicians at pLLV. The primary outcome was viral suppression at week 48; week 24 and week 96 suppression were secondary. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and risk differences (aRD) were estimated using logistic regression. Longitudinal viral load and CD4 trends were assessed using rank-based nonparametric longitudinal models.
162 participants were included (97 control; 65 switch). Viral suppression at week 48 was 64.37% in the control group and 68.52% in the switch group (aOR 1.40, P = 0.427; aRD 0.07, P = 0.423). At week 24, suppression occurred in 40.98% and 50.00%, respectively (aOR 1.34, P = 0.521; aRD 0.07, P = 0.518). HIV RNA levels decreased and CD4 increased modestly over time in both groups without between-group differences.
In this retrospective cohort, regimen switching after pLLV was not associated with improved virologic suppression.

PMID:
42627820
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement