Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Stereotypical interciliary contacts in a C. elegans sense organ.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Nikhila Krishnan, Samantha Leslie, Hannah Lawson, Yu-Ming Lu, Leland Wexler, Kirsten Judge, Maxwell G Heiman, Piali Sengupta

Published in

G3 (Bethesda, Md.). Aug 22, 2026. Epub Aug 22, 2026.

Abstract

Physical interactions among cells and their processes are critical for intercellular communication and the generation of ordered tissue patterns. Primary cilia projecting from the cell surface have recently been shown to form contacts with the processes of diverse cell types, as well as with other cilia, in the brain and other organs. Whether these ciliary contacts are established in an instructive manner or are formed passively due to physical proximity is unclear. Ultrastructural analyses previously showed that the cilia of a subset of sensory neurons in the head amphid organs of C. elegans exhibit interciliary contacts within a glia-defined channel. Here we show that these ciliary contact patterns are stereotyped and can be established in the absence of neighboring cilia, indicating that these associations may not simply reflect relative positioning within the amphid channel. We show that mutations in genes implicated in ciliary protein trafficking, ciliary membrane phospholipid composition, and cilia-cell interactions disrupt cilia structure and/or interciliary contacts, and that in a subset of mutants, cilia with altered morphologies can nevertheless establish correct contacts. Together, our findings suggest that cilia-cilia interactions within a sense organ are established via instructive mechanisms, and raise the possibility that cellular functions may be modulated by cilia-mediated intercellular communication.

PMID:
42628967
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement