Comparing the Diagnostic Characteristics of Neuropathy Questionnaires in Adults With Obesity.

Authors

Nicholas Heaton, Evan L Reynolds, Fallon Koenig, Lavanya Muthukumar, Merel Huijg, Noor E Taams, Pieter A van Doorn, Brian C Callaghan

Published in

Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS. Volume 31. Issue 3. Pages e70163.

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic characteristics of three peripheral neuropathy (PN) patient-completed questionnaires.
We recruited participants with obesity from a previously completed randomized controlled trial. Patient-completed PN questionnaires included the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq), the Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score, and the Erasmus Polyneuropathy Symptom Score (E-PSS). PN was defined using the Toronto consensus definition for confirmed neuropathy. Secondary PN definitions included probable neuropathy and definitions based on skin biopsy, nerve conduction studies, and clinical scales. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and significant differences in AUC were assessed with DeLong's test. Potential diagnostic thresholds and corresponding predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated.
We enrolled 59 participants (mean [SD] age: 53 [7] years, 76% female, 81% White), and 20.3% had neuropathy. E-PSS had the largest AUC (95% confidence interval) for confirmed neuropathy (0.84, 0.71-0.97), followed by MNSIq (0.76, 0.63-0.90) and the DNS (0.72, 0.54-0.90), but these differences were not significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences were seen for secondary PN definitions (all p > 0.05). All three questionnaires were highly correlated with one another (r range: 0.70-0.72, all p < 0.01), and diagnostic thresholds were estimated.
All three patient-completed questionnaires displayed good diagnostic accuracy for PN and were highly correlated. Our findings suggest that questionnaires can be used to determine PN in large epidemiological studies and might be useful as screening instruments in clinical care.

PMID:
42629177
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.