Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinical utilization of CPET in obesity-associated unexplained exertional dyspnea: Narrative review and expert perspective.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Fa-Chang Yu, Cho-Kai Wu, Shih-Hsien Sung, Yen-Wen Wu, Chih-Chung Hsiao, Kai-Chun Chang, Bing-Hsiean Tzeng, Chia-Ti Tsai, Chung-Lieh Hung

Published in

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi. Aug 21, 2026. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

Obesity-associated exertional dyspnea is a major diagnostic blind spot in contemporary heart failure care. In many patients, symptoms reflect overlapping contributions from mechanical ventilatory constraint, low cardiorespiratory fitness, regional cardiac adiposity, peripheral skeletal muscle dysfunction, and occult heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Diagnosis is frequently delayed because obesity lowers natriuretic peptide concentrations, reduces the sensitivity of resting echocardiography, and overlaps with noncardiac causes of exercise intolerance. Current evidence supports obesity-related HFpEF as a distinct phenotype shaped by visceral and epicardial adiposity, maladaptive adipokine signaling, inflammation, plasma volume expansion, and abnormal exercise hemodynamics. In this context, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is best viewed as a mechanistic phenotyping tool that helps refine suspicion, characterize the dominant physiological limitation, and guide further testing when resting evaluation is inconclusive. Emerging anti-obesity therapies have strengthened the clinical importance of recognizing obesity-related HFpEF, but whether treatment-induced benefit is accompanied by improvement in CPET-defined physiology remains uncertain.

PMID:
42629215
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement