Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mechanistic Analysis of Drug Linker Clearance During Ultrafiltration/Diafiltration of an Antibody-Drug Conjugate.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

Vasudev Tangry, Fara Lyu, Amy Le, Laurie Mlinar, Manish S Kelkar, Andrew L Zydney

Published in

Biotechnology and bioengineering. Aug 21, 2026. Epub Aug 21, 2026.

Abstract

Ultrafiltration/diafiltration (UF/DF) is a key unit operation in the manufacture of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), commonly utilized for post-conjugation purification to remove residual Drug Linker (DL) compounds and affect buffer exchange. The clearance of residual drug linker (DL), however, is often well below that predicted by ideal diafiltration theory. This work provides the first detailed mechanistic analysis of the factors that influence DL clearance during constant volume diafiltration, with particular emphasis on antibody concentration, membrane properties, and operating conditions. Diafiltration experiments in both stirred cell and tangential flow filtration systems demonstrate that DL sieving coefficients decrease with increasing ADC concentration and with increasing filtrate flux. These trends are quantitatively described using a newly developed diafiltration model accounting for intermolecular association between the hydrophobic DL and the ADC, with the ADC concentration at the membrane surface evaluated using the classical concentration polarization analysis. Experimental data obtained over a range of conditions are well-described using this concentration polarization-binding model. The model not only explains DL clearance data, but it also provides a framework for effective process design of UF/DF processes to ensure the required levels of DL clearance during ADC purification.

PMID:
42629990
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement