Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care.

Created on 22 Aug 2026

Authors

J Schultke, M Reeh, J-E Michaelis, P Rothe, Y Hagmayer, F Braulke

Published in

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. Volume 152. Issue 8. Aug 19, 2026. Epub Aug 19, 2026.

Abstract

Psychosocial stressors and mental disorders can negatively affect the success of cancer treatments. Therefore, they should be addressed by target group-oriented psycho-oncological care. This study examined possible predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care.
Routine data from 5217 patients of a German Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2020 and 2023 were analysed in a retrospective monocentric study. The effects of predictors (gender, age, distance to the center, subjective stress at intake, and tumor stage) on the use of psycho-oncological care (use vs. no use) and on the number of psycho-oncological care sessions lasting at least 20 min were explored using logistic and binomial regression analyses.
Women at younger age, experiencing subjective distress, and patients with advanced-stage cancer were significantly more likely to use psycho-oncological support. Female patients, younger patients, patients who lived closer to the treating centre, patients with subjective distress, and patients at higher tumor stages attended more sessions of psycho-oncological counselling. The analyses also indicated substantial differences between different organ-specific cancer centers.
All patients should be screened for psychological distress and wish for psycho-oncological support by a structured and validated tool. Vulnerable patients, patients at risk, and those, who are hesitant to seek help, could be screened by an interview to reduce barriers.

PMID:
42629497
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement