Listening for extinction: Range-wide occupancy highlights critical risks and priorities for northern spotted owls.

Authors

Damon B Lesmeister, Julianna M A Jenkins, Raymond J Davis, Natalie M Rugg, Cara L Appel, Larissa L Bailey, Erin Bayne, Tara Chestnut, Leila S Duchac, Katie M Dugger, Taylor D Ellis, Alan B Franklin, Scott A Gremel, Aaron Henderson, Edward Henson, J Mark Higley, James E Hines, Bruce Hollen, William L Kendall, Taal Levi, Darryl I MacKenzie, Christopher E McCafferty, Thomas Munger, David T Press, Caroline Provost, Suzanne Reffler, Zachary J Ruff, James K Swingle, Erica Tevini, Alaina D Thomas, Matthew J Weldy, Kirsten Wert, Angela White, Charles B Yackulic

Published in

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America. Volume 36. Issue 5. Pages e70294.

Abstract

The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) continues to decline across its range, threatened by habitat disturbances and invasive barred owls (Strix varia). We conducted a range-wide spotted owl occupancy assessment using 2.1 million h of passive acoustic recordings from 4081 survey stations within 1027 randomly selected 5-km² hexagons across six physiographic regions. Applying multistate occupancy models, we estimated probabilities of landscape use (by at least one northern spotted owl) and pair occupancy (occupied by both a male and a female), while accounting for imperfect and sex-biased detection probability. Detection probability of pairs was low in most regions, primarily due to undetected females, but increased with survey effort. If management decisions can only be made when there is a high probability of detecting both sexes when they are present, then longer surveys are one approach to support the decisions. Landscape use and pair occupancy were positively associated with old-growth forest structure and topographic diversity. We also found a pronounced latitudinal gradient in spotted owl landscape use rates with estimated mean landscape use of 0.17 (SE = 0.03) and 0.16 (SE = 0.02) in the two most northern regions, and 0.54 (SE = 0.04) and 0.52 (SE = 0.05) in the two most southern regions. Pair occupancy rates were higher in southern regions (0.29, SE = 0.03, 0.43, SE = 0.05) and very low in northern regions (0.04, SE = 0.01, 0.03, SE = 0.01). In contrast to spotted owls, barred owls were detected in 90% of northern hexagons and 50% of southern hexagons, and barred owl calling intensity was over eight times higher than spotted owls. These results highlight extinction risks in several regions and suggest that management actions, such as spatially targeted barred owl control and protection of structurally complex habitats, have a narrow temporal window in which they can be effective in lowering the probability of regional extirpations. We generated predictive maps of landscape use and pair occupancy, which could help guide regional conservation strategies. This study demonstrates how passive acoustic monitoring and machine learning can be used for broad-scale ecological monitoring, identifying extinction risk thresholds, supporting adaptive management, and improving conservation outcomes for wide-ranging and elusive species that can reliably be detected through unique vocalizations.

PMID:
42630130
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.