Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Esophageal thermometry outperforms bladder and tympanic monitoring during targeted temperature management and shock in the ICU.

Created on 23 Aug 2026

Authors

Xiaoyun Li, Lingyun Zuo, Zihao Yu, Qin Ye, Hongtang Liang, Xiaojing Wang, Ning Zhang, Yongfu Zheng, Yongjun Liu

Published in

Journal of critical care. Volume 97. Pages 155728. Aug 22, 2026. Epub Aug 22, 2026.

Abstract

Accurate core temperature management is fundamental to intensive care unit (ICU) practice, yet the dynamic reliability of less-invasive surrogate metrics during critical illness remains under-investigated. This study evaluated the accuracy and potential confounders of esophageal, bladder, and tympanic thermometry against intravascular temperature.
A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in 22 ICU patients receiving concurrently multi-site core temperature monitoring. High-resolution temperature and hemodynamic data were extracted over up to 72 h. Absolute agreement and dynamic trending were assessed using Bland-Altman and four-quadrant analyses, with confounders evaluated via Spearman correlation matrices.
Among 833 paired measurements, esophageal thermometry demonstrated near-perfect agreement with intravascular temperature (bias 0.11 °C; 95% limits of agreement [LoA] -0.19 to 0.41 °C; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.957). In contrast, bladder and tympanic modalities showed wider 95% LoAs (-0.32 to 0.82 °C and -0.62 to 0.55 °C, respectively) and context-dependent reliability. During targeted temperature management (TTM), bladder temperature exhibited marked thermal lag (trending concordance rate, 50.2%), driven by cardiac output, where decreased cardiac output increased delays between core and bladder temperature during cooling and re-warming (r = -0.42, P < 0.05). Tympanic thermometry errors were independent of hemodynamic parameters, showing no correlation with cardiac index (r = 0.08, P = 0.218) or norepinephrine dosage (r = 0.13, P = 0.052).
Esophageal thermometry is a highly reliable non-invasive surrogate for intravascular temperature. Conversely, bladder thermometry is susceptible to flow-dependent thermal inertia during shock and TTM. Meanwhile, tympanic measurements exhibit wide, hemodynamically-independent variability, rendering them unreliable for continuous monitoring.

PMID:
42632315
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement