Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Hierarchical Flux Competition Governs Electrochemical-Chemical Coupling in Redox-Mediated Batteries.

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Shiqiang Huang, Mengxiao Li, Songpeng Huang, Michael Grätzel, Qing Wang

Published in

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English). Pages e7034615. Aug 23, 2026. Epub Aug 23, 2026.

Abstract

Redox-mediated processes offer an effective strategy to accelerate sluggish kinetics and improve active-material utilization across diverse battery chemistries. However, rational optimization remains challenging due to the lack of a quantitative framework describing the interplay among competing kinetic processes. Here, we establish a kinetic framework for electrochemical (EC)-chemical coupling by defining three flux descriptors for interfacial electron transfer, solid-state ion transport, and mediator diffusion. Integrated with EC parameters, these descriptors reveal the hierarchy of competing fluxes and enable analytical determination of current-matching boundaries. The framework identifies and regulates rate-limiting steps to achieve flux-balanced operation with enhanced utilization and reduced polarization. Guided by this framework, a redox-targeting flow battery based on a [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-/Prussian blue catholyte delivers a volumetric capacity of 48.6 Ah/L at 100 mA/cm2 over 6500 h in a symmetric-cell configuration and achieves 27.6 Wh/L in a full-cell configuration. A ferrocene/LiFePO4 redox system also achieves 93.91% capacity retention at a practical areal capacity of 3 mAh/cm2 over 2800 h. This work establishes a general framework for flux-balanced battery design, enabling simultaneous enhancement of energy density and rate capability.

PMID:
42633666
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement