Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk prediction model and intervention strategies for intraoperative hypothermia in robotic-assisted urological surgery.

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Yue Guo, Ruixia Hao, Na Xu, Yan Jiang, Wen Ke, Yanyan Li, Liyuan Meng, Li Li, Xiumei Wang

Published in

Journal of robotic surgery. Volume 20. Issue 1. Aug 24, 2026. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

To develop a risk prediction model for intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing robotic-assisted urological surgery and formulate hierarchical warming strategies. This single-centre retrospective study calculated the sample size using G*Power 3.1. A total of 487 patients admitted to our hospital from May 2023 to May 2025 were included after correcting for 10% invalid samples (minimum required: 438). Hypothermia was defined as an intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature < 36 ℃. Patients were divided into hypothermia (n = 61) and non-hypothermia (n = 426) groups. Lasso regression was used to screen variables, and a binary logistic regression model with a nomogram was constructed and internally validated by 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Operating room temperature, the absence of active warming measures, age, body mass index and preoperative baseline core temperature were independent risk factors (P < 0.05). The model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.928 (sensitivity 91.8%, specificity 80.5%, Youden index 0.723). The corrected AUC was 0.915 after validation. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ²=7.514, P = 0.0897) showed good calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated significant clinical net benefit. The prediction model has excellent performance, which can accurately identify high-risk patients and guide personalised perioperative warming to reduce intraoperative hypothermia incidence.

PMID:
42634059
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement