Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

scTimeBench: a streamlined benchmarking platform for single-cell time-series analysis.

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Adrien Osakwe, Eric H Huang, Yue Li

Published in

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). Volume 42. Issue Supplement_2. Aug 01, 2026.

Abstract

Temporal modelling of single-cell gene expression is essential for capturing dynamic cellular processes, yet a systematic framework for evaluating time-aware trajectory inference methods has not yet been established. Here, we present a modular and scalable benchmark designed to assess methods across three critical tasks: forecast accuracy (temporal cell alignment) for projecting cells to unseen time points, embedding coherence between original and projected data, and cell-type lineage fidelity. We evaluated ten state-of-the-art methods, which are broadly categorized into 8 forecasting-based and 2 optimal transport (OT)-based methods across eight diverse datasets spanning four species. Our results show that while several methods achieve high forecast accuracy, they often fail to preserve biological signals, both in their latent spaces and in cell lineage reconstruction. Notably, most methods confer low lineage fidelity and often underperform compared to a correlation baseline. We further demonstrate that integrating pseudotime can effectively denoise trajectories by aligning the data snapshots with the intrinsic biological clock in each cell. Finally, to streamline benchmarking for temporal single-cell analysis, we built one of the first self-contained Python packages for the research community.
https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/scTimeBench.

PMID:
42635195
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement