Authors
K Jisna, V Jereen, A Arthi, George Roshan Prasanth Durairaj, Dhinesh Kumar
Published in
Annals of African medicine. Aug 25, 2026. Epub Aug 25, 2026.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition with both smoking and nonsmoking etiologies. Data comparing clinicoradiological characteristics and bronchodilator response (BDR) between smokers and nonsmokers remain limited, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, this investigation aimed to compare these parameters among smokers and nonsmokers with COPD.
This hospital-based, prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center over 18 months. A total of 80 COPD patients (40 smokers and 40 nonsmokers) were enrolled. Baseline clinical, radiological, and spirometric data were recorded, and follow-up assessment was performed at 3 months. Pulmonary function testing was conducted according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines. Data were analyzed by utilizing SPSS, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Baseline characteristics have been comparable among groups, except for gender distribution (P < 0.001). Smokers had significantly higher respiratory rate and lower oxygen saturation (P < 0.05). Hyperinflation was more common among smokers (P < 0.05), whereas nonsmokers showed greater radiological improvement. Although baseline pulmonary function was similar, nonsmokers demonstrated significantly greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and higher bronchodilator responsiveness (P < 0.05). Symptom burden was enhanced in both groups without a significant intergroup difference (P > 0.05).
Smokers with COPD exhibit greater physiological impairment and structural lung changes, whereas nonsmokers demonstrate better BDR and functional recovery. These findings highlight COPD heterogeneity and the need for phenotype-based management strategies.
PMID:
42635348
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 2
- Comments 0