Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A scoping review of muscle excitation in resistance training across key training parameters.

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Josef Fischer, Christian Burger, Gerit Plöschberger, Andreas Konrad

Published in

Journal of sports sciences. Pages 1-25. Aug 24, 2026. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

Resistance training is widely recognized for its health and performance benefits. Since muscle activation correlates with muscle strength and performance, optimizing training variables to maximize activation during resistance training exercises is of interest. However, the most effective approach remains debated. This scoping review examines the impact of training variables such as intensity, range of motion (ROM), and repetition duration on muscle excitation, measured via surface electromyography (sEMG), in healthy, pain-free adults (≥18 years). Only original research in English was considered, focusing on acute bipolar sEMG assessments. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 63 studies (35 on intensity, 13 on ROM, 15 on repetition duration) involving 966 participants. The findings indicate that higher training intensities generally produce greater sEMG signals. In addition, faster repetition durations are linked to increased muscle excitation, and greater ROM enhances excitation when repetition speed is controlled. However, when velocity is not standardized, ROM findings remain inconsistent. The current evidence suggests that higher intensity and faster repetitions increase muscle activation, while the effects of ROM remain unclear. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps and improving the experimental design to better understand the interplay of these training variables on muscle excitation.

PMID:
42635423
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 44
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement