Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of Flexible and Navigable Suction Versus Conventional Ureteral Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Prospective RIRSearch Group Study.

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Mehmet Fatih Şahin, Çağrı Doğan, Kerem Teke, Muhammed Fatih Şimşekoğlu, Mustafa Bilal Tuna, Oktay Özman, Hakan Çakır, Cem Başataç, Önder Çınar, Murat Akgül, Duygu Sıddıkoğlu, Cenk Murat Yazıcı, Eyüp Burak Sancak, Barbaros Başeskioğlu, Haluk Akpınar, Bülent Önal

Published in

Journal of endourology. Pages 8927790261480580. Aug 24, 2026. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) against the conventional ureteral access sheath (CUAS) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
A total of 161 patients who underwent RIRS at seven centers using similar surgical methods (thulium fiber laser and 7.5 F disposable flexible ureterorenoscope) were prospectively enrolled in the study between May 2024 and September 2025. The patients were randomized into two groups based on the use of UAS (Group 1: CUAS; Group 2: FANS-UAS). Demographic and clinical data of the patients, stone characteristics, surgical data, perioperative and postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were analyzed for comparison.
Of the 161 patients included in the study, 79 received a CUAS and 82 received a FANS-UAS. The groups were demographically similar (p > 0.05). The postoperative SFR at 1 month was statistically significantly higher in the FANS-UAS group (79.3% vs 63.3%, p = 0.041), and the operative time was shorter in the CUAS group (p = 0.011). The perioperative bleeding rate was higher in the FANS-UAS group (p = 0.034), although there was no significant difference in postoperative hemoglobin decrease. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications (p = 0.162).
The FANS-UAS is an effective method that increases SFR compared to the CUAS. Although the FANS-UAS prolongs operation time and increases perioperative bleeding, both FANS-UAS and the CUAS are similarly safe in terms of postoperative complications.

PMID:
42635373
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement