Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Analyzing the influence of deafness on serial position function for letters.

Created on 25 Aug 2026

Authors

Veena Kamble, Jennifer Leleux, Marie Pirlot, Virginie Crollen

Published in

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. Aug 24, 2026. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that letter and digit identification typically follows a W-shaped serial position function, whereas symbol identification exhibits an inverted U-shaped pattern. Given that reading outcomes vary widely among deaf populations, the present study investigated whether deaf adults display serial position functions similar to hearing adults. Using the Target-in-String Identification paradigm, we compared letter, digit, and symbol recognition across five target positions in matched groups of deaf and hearing participants. Both groups demonstrated a pronounced first-letter advantage, consistent with specialized position-tuned letter detectors. However, only the hearing group showed the canonical W-shaped function for letters. Deaf participants exhibited a more linear and quadratic profile, with reduced accuracy at central positions, which may be consistent with a potentially greater influence of visual crowding, even within foveal vision. No reliable position effects emerged for symbols, and both groups displayed similar linear position effects for digits. These findings indicate that while initial-letter prioritization is preserved in deaf readers, spatial tuning for other positions may be influenced, partially supporting the MRF theory and underscoring the need for models that account for variability in orthographic processing across populations.

PMID:
42636294
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement