Mechanistic modulation of macromolecular interactions between modified cellulose and myofibrillar protein under low salt conditions: effects on gel properties.

Authors

Zhi Huang, Can Deng, Xiangyun Cao, Wei Quan, Aihua Lou, Yan Liu, Qingwu Shen, Lei Zhou

Published in

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.). Volume 242. Issue Pt 5. Pages 120229. Oct 31, 2026. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

The effects and mechanisms of methylcellulose (MC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) on myofibrillar protein (MP) gelation at 0.3 M NaCl were investigated. Results showed that all celluloses enhanced the hardness, springiness, and water-holding capacity of low salt MP gel in a dose-dependent manner. Specifically, MC and HPMC reached optimal performance at 0.9% concentration, whereas CMC and MCC reached their peak at 0.3% addition. In particular, 0.9% MC addition gave the low-salt MP gel its highest hardness (502.98 g), water-holding capacity (98.7%), and storage modulus (3388 Pa), surpassing the normal-salt control. MC increased MP surface hydrophobicity from 58.9 to 86.1, facilitated disulfide and non-disulfide covalent cross-linking of myosin heavy chain intensity, and formed the densest gel microstructure. HPMC most strongly promoted low salt MP disulfide bond formation and achieved a water-holding capacity of 96.8%. However, its thermally reversible network partly dissociated upon cooling, limiting the storage modulus to 1656 Pa. CMC addition increased the absolute zeta potential from 17.4 mV to 34-37 mV via its carboxymethyl groups, generating electrostatic repulsion that impeded MP aggregation and led to a weak gel with high immobilized water but low water-holding capacity (86.8%). MCC behaved as an inert filler, yielding only marginal improvements. In conclusion, low-salt MP gel with MC addition surpassed normal-salt levels through hydrophobicity-driven unfolding and network reinforcement, with HPMC addition reaching normal-salt levels by enhancing disulfide bond formation, while the benefits of CMC and MCC additions were limited by electrostatic repulsion and inert filling.

PMID:
42637374
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.