Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Combined umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell exosome and cell therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Created on 25 Aug 2026

Authors

Berhan Keskin, Beytullah Cakal, Aykun Hakgor, Atakan Dursun, Aysel Akhundova, Umeyir Savur, Ozlem Onder, Haci Murat Gunes, Ibrahim Oguz Karaca, Bilal Boztosun

Published in

Regenerative medicine. Pages 1-8. Aug 24, 2026. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) and their exosomes represent potential regenerative approaches for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This pilot study evaluated a combined UC-MSC-derived exosome and UC-MSC treatment strategy in HFrEF.
Ten male patients received intracoronary exosomes (20 × 109 particles) followed by two intravenous UC-MSC infusions (1 × 106 cells/kg) at one-week intervals. Echocardiographic parameters, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) scores were assessed longitudinally using linear mixed-effects models.
LVEF increased at 3 months (β = 4.45%, p = 0.003), 6 months (β = 5.35%, p < 0.001), and 1 year (β = 4.66%, p = 0.002). Left ventricular dimensions decreased significantly at 6 months and 1 year. Log-transformed NT-proBNP decreased significantly only at 6 months (β = -0.54, p = 0.033), while KCCQ-12 scores did not change significantly. No treatment-related serious adverse events were identified; one patient developed transient pulmonary congestion.
The combined strategy was feasible and associated with modest improvements in cardiac function and ventricular dimensions. Given the small, uncontrolled pilot design, these findings are exploratory and do not establish efficacy or safety. Larger randomized controlled studies are required.

PMID:
42638332
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 25
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement