Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Descriptive Overview of Deviations From an Institutional Peripheral Vasopressor Protocol and Its Effects on Safety Across an Academic Health System.

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Daniel Shyu, Nicholas E Ingraham, Bailey McCarville, Christopher A Linke, Nicole Newman, Lianne K Siegel, Jared A Larson, Anna R Benson, Kathryn M Pendleton

Published in

Critical care explorations. Volume 8. Issue 9. Pages e1469. Sep 01, 2026. Epub Aug 25, 2026.

Abstract

This study characterized deviations from an institutional peripheral vasopressor protocol and assessed associated extravasation events.
Retrospective observational study of electronic medical records data.
Ten hospitals in an academic health system from October 2020 to May 2023.
All admitted adult patients who received vasopressor infusions.
Implementation of a peripheral vasopressor protocol in October 2020.
Three thousand five hundred eighteen patients were identified as having received peripheral vasopressors from October 2020 to May 2023, with 1258 patients suspected of having a deviation from the protocol. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomly selected for chart review, and 73 patients had confirmed deviation. Sixty-three (86.3%) exceeded the maximum allowed dose, 23 had multiple simultaneously infusing peripheral vasopressors, 13 had a peripheral vasopressor infusing longer than 24 hours, and 13 received peripheral vasopressin. Most deviations (79.4%) occurred due to worsening shock while waiting for central access. Extravasation occurred in 10 patients (13.7%), with three patients requiring phentolamine treatment. Fifty-six patients (76.7%) subsequently required central access for continued vasopressor support. In a secondary analysis of the original source population, 47 of 3518 patients (1.3%) received phentolamine for peripheral vasopressor extravasation, of whom the majority (72.4%) were protocol concordant at the time of extravasation.
Deviations from a peripheral vasopressor protocol primarily involved exceeding the protocol dose limit in the setting of worsening shock while awaiting central access. Clinically significant extravasations were infrequent even among patients with protocol deviations and most treated extravasations occurred in protocol-concordant patients, supporting the overall safety of peripheral vasopressors.

PMID:
42640631
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement