Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

From Underrepresentation to Inclusion: Women Who Stutter in Research and Practice.

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Ran An, Charn Nang, Ai Leen Choo, Ineke Samson

Published in

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR. Pages 1-10. Aug 25, 2026. Epub Aug 25, 2026.

Abstract

Women who stutter have historically received limited analytic attention in stuttering research and clinical practice. Although the higher male-to-female persistence ratio partly shapes sample composition, repeated reliance on male-majority samples has also contributed to a sex-skewed evidence base, limiting insight into women's experiences and clinical needs. Using a biopsychosocial framework, this article identifies key domains for inquiry and proposes a research, clinical, and educational agenda to address the underrepresentation of women who stutter and its implications for evidence generation, care, and professional training.
This agenda-setting viewpoint draws on evidence from stuttering-specific and broader interdisciplinary literature and organizes it within a biopsychosocial framework. It examines how study design, analytic practices, and reporting conventions have shaped the visibility of women in the stuttering evidence base and identifies priorities for research, clinical practice, and professional education.
The analysis identifies a sex-skewed evidence base shaped by male-majority samples and the frequent pooling of data from women and men. Emerging evidence suggests that biological, psychological, social, and communication-related factors may shape women's experiences of stuttering in clinically meaningful ways. Accordingly, this viewpoint identifies three areas for action: (a) strengthen the evidence base through multidimensional research and sex- and gender-informed study design, analysis, and reporting; (b) advance individualized, gender-sensitive clinical care; and (c) integrate sex- and gender-informed content into professional education and development.
Explicitly examining women who stutter as a distinct analytic group can strengthen the scientific foundation of speech-language pathology and enable empirical clarification rather than presupposition. This article aimed to support a more representative, clinically informative, and sex- and gender-informed evidence base regarding women who stutter.

PMID:
42640849
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement