Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Online HPLC-Guided Screening of Chemical Composition and Bioactivity in Capparis ovata subsp. canescens.

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Gokhan Zengin, Shakeel Ahmed, Ismail Senkardes, Milena Terzic, Ozan Emre Eyupoglu, Sakina Yagi

Published in

Chemistry & biodiversity. Volume 23. Issue 8. Pages e71625.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the biological activities and online HPLC-DAD profiles of five extracts of Capparis ovata subsp. canescens prepared with ethyl acetate (EA), dichloromethane (DCM), ethanol, 70% ethanol/water, and water. Online HPLC-DAD with post-column antioxidant detection was used to profile tentatively annotated antioxidant-responsive metabolites at 280, 595, 517, 734, and 450 nm. Antioxidant activity was assessed using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC, phosphomolybdenum (PBD), and metal-chelating assays. Eight antioxidant-responsive markers-catechin, cinnamic acid, caffeic acid, γ-tocopherol, apigenin, quercetin-3-O-hexoside, myristoleic acid, and kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside-were tentatively annotated from their chromatographic behavior, UV-DAD characteristics, and post-column antioxidant responses. Ethanol and ethanol/water extracts showed the strongest DPPH (82.35-82.97 mg TE/g), ABTS (93.68-122.00 mg TE/g), FRAP (98.46-116.84 mg TE/g), and CUPRAC (155.43-205.02 mg TE/g) activities. In the PBD assay, EA, ethanol, and DCM showed the highest activities (2.11-2.39 mmol TE/g), with EA displaying the highest numerical value (2.39 ± 0.10 mmol TE/g). These findings support further investigation of C. ovata as a source of antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory constituents, while structural confirmation and dose-response studies remain necessary.

PMID:
42641003
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement