Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Females cooperate, rather than monopolize reproduction, in multi-female groups of cooperatively breeding birds and mammals.

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Yitzchak Ben Mocha, Tal Dahan, Zitan Song, Michael Griesser

Published in

Proceedings. Biological sciences. Volume 293. Issue 2077. Aug 26, 2026.

Abstract

Scholars have long sought to understand why, in some cooperatively breeding species, females care for the offspring of other group members while forgoing their own reproduction. Here, we analysed data from 101 cooperatively breeding populations of 73 bird and mammal species to advance research on this question. First, we illustrate the extent to which this question is relevant by mapping the substantial interspecific variation in the prevalence of multi-female groups (because only in these groups can females either compete or cooperate with respect to reproduction). Second, we show that in multi-female groups, females more often alloparent each others' offspring and share, rather than monopolize, reproduction. Third, we demonstrate the misleading effect of ignoring social composition when curating empirical data to test theoretical models of social behaviour by revisiting evidence presented to support the limited control model. Taken together, our findings uncover a high degree of reproductive cooperation in multi-female groups of cooperatively breeding birds and mammals. They thereby highlight the need for further research on the conditions that (i) favour the formation of multi-female groups (i.e. as a precondition for reproductive cooperation), and (ii) subsequently support the realization and maintenance of female cooperation once it becomes possible.

PMID:
42642067
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1941
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement