The impact of preoperative mechanical support on long-term survival following early lung re-transplantation for graft failure.

Authors

Vikram Krishna, Allen A Razavi, Brian Lim, Zachary Brennan, Qiudong Chen, Joanna Chikwe, Michael E Bowdish, Laura DiChiacchio, Reinaldo Rampolla, Dominick Megna, Pedro Catarino

Published in

JHLT open. Volume 14. Pages 100626. Epub Jul 17, 2026.

Abstract

Severe graft failure after lung transplantation is a devastating outcome with limited therapeutic options. Mechanical support provides temporary stabilization but may compromise re-transplantation candidacy. This study examined postoperative outcomes and long-term survival of graft failure re-transplants by preoperative mechanical support use.
The UNOS database was queried for adults undergoing early re-transplantation for graft failure (EGF) performed within 1 year of the primary transplant from 2005 to 2025. Primary transplants, multiorgan, and re-transplants from unknown causes were excluded. Patients were stratified by preoperative mechanical support use (ventilation and/or ECMO). The primary outcome was 5-year survival.
Among 1453 re-transplants, 140 (9.6%) were for EGF. 85 (61%) required preoperative mechanical support (61%), and 55 did not (39%). Within the mechanical support group, 72 (85%) were ventilated, 44 (52%) received ECMO, and 31 (36%) had both ECMO and ventilation. Supported patients had higher LAS scores (89.3 vs 71.6, p<0.001) and more dialysis use (24% vs 1%, p<0.001). Postoperatively, supported patients experienced more prolonged ventilation (34% vs 16%, p=0.02) and more ECMO support (20% vs 9%, p=0.03). Ninety-day mortality was equivalent (27.1% vs 16.4%, p=0.14). However, mechanical support use of any form was associated with higher 5-year mortality (adjusted HR 1.71 [1.02-2.85], p=0.04). Combined ventilator and ECMO use had the worst long-term survival compared to no mechanical support (aHR 2.13 [1.03-4.40], p=0.04).
Preoperative mechanical support was associated with greater postoperative morbidity and worse long-term survival. These findings underscore the need to critically evaluate whether re-transplantation truly benefits this high-risk population.

PMID:
42643254
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.