Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Results From and Preliminary Validation of the Workplace-Related Community Health Worker Common Indicators in a Large-Scale Sample.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Noelle Wiggins, Katie C Stalker, Tommy English, Mary-Ellen Brown, Susan Mayfield-Johnson, Victoria Adewumi, Pennie Jewell, Celeste Sanchez-Lloyd, Ada M Wilkinson-Lee

Published in

American journal of public health. Volume 116. Issue S4. Pages S276-S284.

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate workplace conditions in the Community Health Workers (CHWs) for COVID Response and Resilient Communities initiative using the workplace-related CHW Common Indicators and to conduct a preliminary validation of those indicators. Methods. A CHW survey conducted between February 12, 2024, and March 29, 2024, incorporated all or part of the workplace-related Common Indicators. We produced descriptive statistics to answer evaluation questions and conducted exploratory factor analyses to initially validate scalar portions of the indicators. Results. Our analyses revealed generally positive ratings of workplace conditions for CHWs in diverse sites around the United States. Scalar components of the Common Indicators achieved Cronbach alpha values above 0.8 and loaded on 1 principal factor per scale. Conclusions. Our findings from a definable large-scale sample confirm that the Common Indicators provide a practical, reliable, and valid way to measure workplace conditions that allow CHWs to be optimally effective across settings and jurisdictions. The positive results indicate that a federal CHW program can help to create beneficial workplace conditions for CHWs while making it possible to compare consistent data about the CHW workforce. (Am J Public Health. 2026;116(S4):S276-S284. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308641).

PMID:
42647812
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement