Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

AdvanTIG-301: a phase III study of ociperlimab plus tislelizumab and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Ligang Xing, Terufumi Kato, Antonin Levy, Billy W Loo, Alexander I Spira, Jie Wang, Xiangjiao Meng, Qingsong Pang, Firas Badin, Hui Wang, Manuel Dómine Gómez, Ying Wang, Yong Chen, Bin Yao, Li Yang, Jinming Yu, Solange Peters

Published in

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. Volume 14. Issue 8. Aug 26, 2026. Epub Aug 26, 2026.

Abstract

Patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an unmet need for new therapies that improve survival. This phase III trial investigated the safety and efficacy of concurrent ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in treatment-naïve patients with stage III NSCLC.
In this phase III, multicenter, randomized, multiarm, open-label trial, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC received concurrent ociperlimab plus tislelizumab and cCRT, followed by ociperlimab plus tislelizumab (arm A), tislelizumab and cCRT, followed by tislelizumab (arm B), or cCRT, followed by durvalumab (arm C) (NCT04866017). Objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, time to death or distant metastasis (TTDM), and safety and tolerability for arms A versus C, B versus C, and A versus B.
63 patients were randomized to arms A (N=22), B (N=19), and C (N=22) prior to early trial termination. In A, B, and C, respectively, 95.5% (21/22), 84.2% (16/19), and 95.5% (21/22) were current or former smokers, and 68.2% (15/22), 73.7% (14/19), and 68.2% (15/22) had PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of ≥1%. Median PFS (95% CI) was not reached (NR) (6.3-not estimable (NE)) in A, 15.0 months (7.4 to NE) in B, and 10.4 months (5.7 to NE) in C. Median OS and TTDM were NR in any arm. ORR (95% CI) was 68.2% (45.1%-86.1%) in A, 68.4% (43.4%-87.4%) in B, and 59.1% (36.4%-79.3%) in C; all responses were partial responses. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all patients; in arms A, B, and C, respectively, pneumonitis occurred in 18.2% (4/22), 5.6% (1/18), and 9.1% (2/22) of patients, and interstitial lung disease occurred in 13.6% (3/22), 11.1% (2/18), and 0% of patients, of which the majority of events for each were grade 1/2. Grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 68.2% (15/22), 66.7% (12/18), and 68.2% (15/22) of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively.
There was a trend toward improved efficacy when adding tislelizumab with or without ociperlimab to cCRT followed by tislelizumab with or without ociperlimab compared with cCRT followed by durvalumab; however, efficacy data were for descriptive purposes only. No unexpected or new safety signals were identified.

PMID:
42648750
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement