Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Improved Deep Learning Segmentation of Pediatric Diffuse Midline Gliomas After Treatment.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

John Zielke, Francesca Romana Mussa, Anna Zapaishchykova, Divyanshu Tak, Atlas Haddadi Avval, Reza Mojahed-Yazdi, Zezhong Ye, Vanessa Rameh, Rajath Ramegowda, Andrew G Schneider, Abdelrahman Hanafy, Cesar Alves, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Sabine Mueller, Daphne A Haas-Kogan, Hugo J W L Aerts, Andreas M Rauschecker, Marius George Linguraru, Tina Y Poussaint, Omar Arnaout, Benjamin H Kann

Published in

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. Aug 26, 2026. Epub Aug 26, 2026.

Abstract

To develop and validate a pediatric diffuse midline glioma (DMG) auto-segmentation tool optimized for longitudinal treatment response assessment across the disease course.
In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we included patients aged 1-30 years with DMG from an institutional pediatric cancer center, BraTS-PEDs 2024, and PNOC007, a prospective trial of radiation followed by peptide vaccine plus poly-ICLC, and we trained nnU-Net-based DMGtracker using expert segmentations from 140 institutional pre- and post-treatment studies and all 261 BraTS-PEDs 2024 pre-treatment studies, using four-sequence multiparametric MRI (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and FLAIR). We externally validated the model on 88 annotated PNOC007 studies (n = 49 patients) and compared it with the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model using median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and relative volumetric difference (RVD) for whole-tumor and contrast-enhancing tumor segmentation using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Training and internal testing used 153 scans (59 post-treatment) from 74 patients. Incorporating post-treatment data improved internal whole-tumor DSC for our trained model (0.94 [IQR 0.82-0.96] vs 0.93 [0.81-0.96]; p<0.001). On external validation, DMGtracker outperformed the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model for whole-tumor segmentation, with higher DSC (0.90 [0.72-0.95] vs 0.81 [0.66-0.90]) and lower RVD (9.6% [3.7%-31.6%] vs 16.8% [7.3%-39.2%]). This advantage was greatest in post-treatment scans (n = 50 scans, DSC 0.90 [0.73-0.94] vs 0.80 [0.58-0.88]; RVD 9.7% [3.8%-26.2%] vs 19.8% [12.6%-39.8%]; p<0.001 for both). In post-treatment scans, DMGtracker achieved clinically acceptable whole-tumor segmentation (DSC > 0.80) in 64.0% of cases, compared with 52.0% for the BraTS-PEDs winner.
Training DMG segmentation models with post-treatment scans substantially improves performance in longitudinal clinical trial imaging, enabling more accurate volumetric tracking and response assessment.

PMID:
42648875
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 27
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement