Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of coproparasitological diagnoses in cats: evaluation of techniques and their combinations.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

A P C Gomes, M C L de Fortes, I F O de Assis, C O Grande, I V Ximenes, G R M Dos Santos, M F M de Lombardi, L Fernandes-Silva, Z M de Assis-Silva, M V S Oliveira, H H A Rezende, I A Braga, D G S de Ramos

Published in

The Journal of small animal practice. Aug 26, 2026. Epub Aug 26, 2026.

Abstract

To compare the Willis, Sheather, Faust, Ritchie and spontaneous sedimentation techniques, as well as their combinations, for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic and semi-domesticated felines.
Coproparasitological analyses were conducted on domestic cats of both sexes and all age groups, including kittens, adults and senior cats, between August 2024 and August 2025. Upon receipt, they were refrigerated at 4°C and processed within a maximum of 24 hours using five different coproparasitological techniques.
One hundred and fifteen samples were positive for at least one parasite form, with diagnoses of Toxocara spp., Ancylostomatidae, Dipylidium caninum, Spirometra spp., Platynosomum fastosum, Giardia spp., Cystoisospora spp. and Entamoeba spp. The Faust technique presented a superior range of diagnosis for low-density structures, whereas the Ritchie technique was effective for high-density structures. However, neither technique achieved a rate of at least 70%. Sensitivity analysis of the combination of these techniques revealed that: the Ritchie with spontaneous sedimentation technique was suitable for diagnosing toxocariasis and platynosomiasis; the Willis with Ritchie technique was appropriate for diagnosing hookworms; the Willis with Faust technique was suitable for diagnosing giardiasis; and the Sheather with Faust technique was appropriate for diagnosing cystoisosporiasis. It was not possible to analyse the association with other parasites owing to their low prevalence.
Coproparasitological techniques remain the primary tools for diagnosing gastrointestinal parasites in routine feline practice, and the veterinarian's clinical suspicion is fundamental for performing the most appropriate technique. Considering the zoonotic potential of several parasites and frequent neglect of feline parasitosis, accurate diagnostic strategies and preventive veterinary practices are fundamental for reducing transmission in animals and humans.

PMID:
42648892
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 29
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement