Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Global Lipidomic Analysis of Lytic KSHV Infection: The Lipid Chaperone FABP4 Supports Maximal Infectious Virion Production.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Eranda Berisha, Erica L Sanchez

Published in

Viruses. Volume 18. Issue 8. Aug 11, 2026. Epub Aug 11, 2026.

Abstract

Kaposi's Sarcoma Herpesvirus (KSHV), an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus, is the etiological agent of Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS), an endothelial cell-based tumor. KSHV is a leading cause of infection-related cancers in sub-Saharan Africa and immunocompromised individuals worldwide. Therefore, it is vital to identify the underlying mechanisms of viral infection and transmission to effectively identify specific therapeutic strategies and combat the disease. Here, we demonstrate that KSHV rewires the host cell lipidome during lytic infection. Bulk lipidomic analysis shows significant changes in the abundance of neutral lipids and phospholipids during lytic infection. We further investigated fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) to understand the underlying mechanisms that support KSHV pathogenesis. Using the doxycycline-inducible iSLK.BAC16 cell line, we find that FABP genes are differentially regulated by lytic KSHV infection compared to latent infection. We report that FABP4 is significantly upregulated during lytic infection. FABP4 knockdown using siRNA or inhibition of the FABP4 protein via treatment with a competitive inhibitor during lytic infection significantly reduces extracellular viral titers, indicating that FABP4 supports maximal infectious virion production. This study highlights the role of FABP4 as a host target that facilitates KSHV infection and pathogenesis.

PMID:
42655693
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement