Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Toward Clinically Feasible Assessment of Muscle Mass: Validation of a Seated Bioelectrical Impedance Device Against Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Older Adults.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Elodie Piche, Emeline Michel, Olivier Guerin, Etienne Gouraud, Frédéric Chorin

Published in

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 26. Issue 16. Aug 12, 2026. Epub Aug 12, 2026.

Abstract

Background: Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference method for measuring appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) and diagnosing sarcopenia, seated bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may represent a practical alternative. As its validity remains still insufficiently documented in specific populations, the objective is to evaluate the agreement between seated BIA and DXA, and examine associations between phase angle (PhA) and physical performance in old adults. Methods: Fifty-nine old adults (75 ± 7 years) underwent DXA and seated BIA (Biody XpertZM3). ASMM was estimated using the Kyle and Sergi equations. Agreement with DXA was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Bland-Altman analysis, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Associations between PhA, handgrip strength, and five-times sit-to-stand (5-STS) performance were evaluated. Results: Both equations showed good agreement with DXA, but the Sergi equation performed better, with higher concordance (CCC = 0.942 vs. 0.898), lower bias (0.44 vs. 1.11 kg), and lower RMSE (1.33 vs. 1.96 kg). PhA correlated positively with handgrip strength (r = 0.315, p = 0.015) but was not associated with 5-STS. Conclusions: Seated BIA provides clinically acceptable estimates of ASMM in older adults. The Sergi equation demonstrated superior accuracy, supporting population-specific equations. PhA may provide additional information on muscle quality and sarcopenia.

PMID:
42655421
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement