Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Divergent Alphacoronavirus Lineages Identified in Alabama Bats, USA.

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Subarna Barua, Charles Rupprecht, Daniel Felipe Barrantes Murillo, Chengming Wang

Published in

Viruses. Volume 18. Issue 8. Aug 12, 2026. Epub Aug 12, 2026.

Abstract

Bats are crucial reservoirs for coronaviruses, yet surveillance in the southeastern United States remains limited. Using carcasses submitted from public health surveillance for rabies, we screened 170 non-rabid bat carcasses from Alabama using a tiered real-time PCR framework targeting broad Alpha- and Betacoronavirus, alongside specific Sarbecovirus and Merbecovirus lineages. Overall, coronavirus prevalence was 3.5% (6/170), with all positives resolving as Alphacoronavirus. Detections spanned six counties and three bat taxa: Tadarida brasiliensis, Myotis spp., and Eptesicus fuscus, with the latter accounting for most cases (4/6; 66.7%). Sequence and phylogenetic analyses revealed two distinct evolutionary lineages. One isolate, ID-51 (E. fuscus), exhibited relative conservation, sharing 95.3% nucleotide and 93.0% amino acid identity with known references, forming a distinct sibling branch. Conversely, a highly divergent cluster of five isolates (ID-06, -145, -147, -169, -175) displayed remarkably low nucleotide similarities (83.7%-84.3%) to GenBank references despite maintaining high amino acid conservation (98.3%-100%). Topological shifts between nucleotide and amino acid phylogenies demonstrated genetic variation within this novel cluster. These findings underscore a previously uncharacterized genetic diversity of coronaviruses in regional US wildlife, highlighting the necessity of expanded local genomic surveillance.

PMID:
42655705
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement