Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cost-effectiveness of the timing of respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation in pediatric patients.

Created on 28 Aug 2026

Authors

Gianmarco Camelo-Pardo, Alejandra Mendoza-Monsalve, Maricel Licht-Ardila, Angélica Lucero Ortiz-Córdoba, José Rafael Almarales-Navarro, Alexandra Hurtado-Ortiz, Anderson Bermon, Edgar Fabián Marique-Hernández

Published in

Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo. Volume 44. Pages e2025275. Epub Aug 24, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of early versus late initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted to the intensive care unit.
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the hospital provider perspective, comparing early (≤7 days) versus late (>7 days) initiation of ECMO. Direct medical costs and 90-day survival were incorporated into a decision tree to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed using a willingness-to-pay threshold equivalent to three times the Colombian gross domestic product per capita.
Among 78 patients, most patients received early ECMO initiation, and this strategy was associated with similar mortality and comparable total direct medical costs compared with late initiation. Probabilistic simulations indicated a higher probability of cost-effectiveness for early initiation across different willingness-to-pay thresholds. Cost parameters were the main drivers of variability in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
No statistically significant differences were observed between early and late ECMO initiation in survival or costs. A possible economic trend favoring early initiation should be interpreted cautiously, given limited statistical power.

PMID:
42659453
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement