Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Profile of individuals with full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) scores in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR).

Created on 29 Aug 2026

Authors

Heidi Castillo, Sophia Drewry, Amy Heffelfinger, Jennifer T Queally, Kurt A Freeman, Vanessa Avemil, Richard Adams, Pamela Murphy, Kathryn Smith, Audrey Roach, Gregory Heuer, William Walker, Jonathan Castillo, Catharine Riley

Published in

Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine. Pages 18758894261485648. Aug 28, 2026. Epub Aug 28, 2026.

Abstract

PurposeAlthough intelligence quotient (IQ) testing can help identify cognitive issues, data on IQ testing in the spina bifida (SB) population is limited and difficult to collect. This study aimed to identify factors influencing IQ test reporting among individuals in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR).MethodsA descriptive analysis of 1,017 individuals aged 4 to 22 years from five NSBPR clinics was conducted. Characteristics of participants with a full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) score (n=435) were compared to those without (n=582). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the likelihood of having an FSIQ score, adjusting for sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, functional level of lesion, and clinic.ResultsIndividuals who received full-time (OR=1.83, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.88) or some (OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.38, 2.82) academic accommodations were more likely to have an FSIQ score. The mean age at IQ testing was 9.7 years (SD: 4.0), and mean FSIQ score was 81.3 (SD: 16.9).ConclusionHistory of academic accommodation was associated with having FSIQ scores. Average FSIQ score was lower than the normative population, highlighting the need for broader testing and care among people with SB.

PMID:
42664414
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement