Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Describing behavioral aspects of annual lung cancer screening participation: Application of the cognitive-social health information processing model.

Created on 29 Aug 2026

Authors

Erin A Hirsch, Kaitlyn Hoover, Stephen P Malkoski, Betsy C Risendal, Jamie L Studts

Published in

Preventive oncology & epidemiology. Volume 4. Issue 1. Epub Jun 22, 2026.

Abstract

Continued participation in yearly screening is necessary to maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT to detect early-stage disease. Determinants of LCS adherence are multi-faceted, rely heavily on factors related to health behavior, and need to be better understood. This exploratory study applied social-cognitive theory to characterize key demographic and clinical factors associated with LCS-specific health information processing related to annual adherence, with the goal of informing future hypothesis generation.
This study employed a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of LCS-eligible individuals who had recently completed a low-dose CT and received results that recommended annual follow-up. Study participants completed a survey based on the Cognitive Social Health Information Processing model to describe health information processing and screening behaviors among individuals eligible for annual LCS.
The survey was completed by 143 LCS individuals with recommended annual follow-up, finding that this population has high self-efficacy about the LCS process, perceives the benefits as high, reports few barriers to continued annual screening, has low fatalism, but also reports suboptimal LCS-specific knowledge.
These findings expand the limited literature addressing psychosocial and behavioral aspects of continued LCS participation and provide valuable information for future communication with LCS participants.

PMID:
42666880
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement