Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Postoperative Margin Management After Conventional Excision of Facial Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Histotype-Specific Framework.

Created on 29 Aug 2026

Authors

Flavio Perottino, Stefano Ottoboni, Giulia Dalmasso, Katia Barbaro, Daniele Sagrafoli, Paola Ghisellini, Cristina Rando, Roberto Eggenhöffner, Mario Borgione

Published in

Journal of skin cancer. Volume 2026. Pages 9952281. Epub Aug 28, 2026.

Abstract

Postoperative management of close or positive margins after conventional excision of facial nonmelanoma skin cancer is challenging, especially in elderly patients and anatomically constrained sites where re-excision may impose functional or aesthetic morbidity.
We retrospectively analysed 238 facial carcinoma cases treated by conventional excision at a peripheral ENT unit, including 172 basal cell carcinomas (BCC) and 66 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Margins were classified as clear, close or positive. Outcomes were analysed descriptively; two-sided Fisher exact tests were used as exploratory descriptors of distributional imbalance under sparse-event conditions, not as tests of treatment superiority or equivalence.
In BCC, no recurrence occurred after clear margins (0/90). Among non-clear-margin BCCs, recurrence remained uncommon after structured surveillance (5/65) and early re-excision (1/17). In SCC, recurrence occurred only after positive margins (3/15), with none after clear or close margins.
The findings support histotype-specific postoperative interpretation of margin status after conventional facial skin cancer excision. In this cohort, selected lower-risk BCC cases were managed through structured surveillance, whereas SCC recurrence was confined to positive-margin cases, supporting a lower threshold for timely re-excision or equivalent oncologic management when clinically feasible.

PMID:
42666713
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement