Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Breaking the Specific Capacity Limit: 409% Boost in Manganese-Based Redox Flow Batteries at High Current Densities with a MnO2 Semi-Solid Slurry Electrolyte.

Created on 30 Aug 2026

Authors

Xin Liu, Zhang Chen, Daiqi Zhou, Qi Zhao, Haitao Feng, Yuanyuan Cui, Changsheng Ding, Yanfeng Gao

Published in

Nano-micro letters. Volume 19. Issue 1. Aug 29, 2026. Epub Aug 29, 2026.

Abstract

The common-ion effect of SO42- limits the solubility of MnSO4 to ≤ 1 M in conventional H2SO4 electrolytes, resulting in low specific capacity of manganese (Mn)-based redox flow batteries (RFBs). Although MnO2 semi-solid RFBs are expected to improve the specific capacity, the sluggish electrochemical reaction kinetics leads to low operating current densities (≤ 1 mA cm-2). Herein, we employ a reverse-design strategy by introducing additional high-concentration MnO2 into the conventional Mn-based electrolyte. Leveraging the MnO2/Mn2+ electrochemical reaction successfully circumvents the common-ion effect, raising the concentration of soluble Mn species in the electrolyte to 3.76 M and achieving a specific capacity of 156.2 Ah L Catholyte - 1 -a 409% increment over reported MnSO4-based electrolytes. Subsequently, the reverse disproportionation of electrolytic MnO2 generated during the second charging cycle shifts the redox mechanism from the MnO2(s)/Mn2+ couple to the solution-phase Mn3+(aq)/Mn2+ pair. This transformation not only elevates the discharge voltage but also enables stable operation at 30 mA cm-2, representing a current density 30-fold higher than reported Mn-based semi-solid RFBs. This work demonstrates a rational design strategy for semi-solid slurry electrolytes to enhance the specific capacity of RFBs, thereby advancing their applicability in grid-scale renewable energy storage.

PMID:
42667513
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement